Total Pageviews

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Course Networking overview


The social networking craze has led to the rise of facebook, twitter, linkedin, and various other platforms.  Some have been tailored towards a certain type of client for example linkedin is for those who consider themselves business professional.  To my knowledge Course Networking(TheCN) is the first of its kind that combines social networking with education.  The Course Networking platform connects educators and students using shared classes and interests.  TheCN’s creator Ali Jafari has created various other platforms that have found success in distance learning and online class management.  For teachers especially this could be helpful as it seems like they can be hesitant to accept facebook or twitter as learning or information spreading tools.  Also, like most social media sites, TheCN is linked to the most popular sites like facebook and twitter to expedite the spread of its popularity around the world. 

Most other platforms for social networking must be bought by universities or institutions to make their money.  TheCN intends to combine that source of revenue with money made from user targeted advertising on the site itself. 

An important function of TheCN is the ability to share notes, readings, and study tools.  Sites like Koofers and Notehall do this but some of them cost money.  This also raises questions about plagiarism and cheating via TheCN.  Users are able to control which information they choose to share and with whom they want to share it with.  As information is uploaded the user is asked who they wish to share it with be that actual classmates, virtual classmates, and the open public.  All of this can be found through the terms of service on Thecn.com. 

Furthermore, from my brief interaction with TheCN it will be best utilized if teachers participate.  Some students may take the initiative to post assignment and other information but, teachers are much more likely to interact with it.  In conclusion, I believe that Course Networking can be a very applicable tool to the many aspects of distance learning and hopefully help improve overall communication between people of similar educational interests.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Online Education

Most are familar with online higher education. Offerings such as Devry University and University of Phoenix come to mind. But what about k-12 education? As reported by Iowa's Press-Citizen private corporations are starting to bring online education to school districts across the country.The article reports on Allan Nelson the superintendent of Clayton Ridge Community School District, who started the company K12 Inc. The company provides full-time online education to students in rural, suburban, and urban districts, and is comparable to home school alternatives, as reported by the founder.

The article highlights the desires of families seeking alternatives to the traditional schooling model. Online alternatives receive similar funding as brick and mortar schools but due to infrastructure needs are positioned to provide families with more efficient use of funds. According to this listing from About.com, thirty-seven states currently provide online alternatives to public k-12 education (Vermont and Virginia are erroneously included but are dead links). Nearby West Virginia utilizes West Virginia Virtual School. and courses are taught though a variety of sources. As noted by the Press-Citizen article, legalities may interfere with the spread of such online programs, and as this is a relatively new use of education technologies ongoing research will be necessary.

Going forward will this type of learning catch on or are there to many barriers for full implementation? There are multiple stakeholders when talking about education, and many have a direct interest in the traditional teacher student classroom model. Governments may enjoy the cheaper alternative, while teachers and unions  detest the loss of a profession. Of course there is also an element of reality missing in some of these offerings. Viewing West Virginia Virtual School, I am wondering how a student can learn drivers education from an online course. These types of offerings can at least bring the student into some sort of learning environment, but additional detail may be required for full understanding of course materials.

Sources in order of use:

http://information.devry.edu/choose-devry?version=36&vc=166085&agid=0075x38642&WT.mc_id=166085&WT.srch=1&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=DeVry&utm_content=10318751556&utm_campaign=DeVry2_VC%3D166085_MT%3DDKS&sc_1=0075S007972GGDKS&sc_2=47a903ae-1456-e168-9a7d-00001f24738f&gclid=CN69hI-hha8CFcbc4Aod2xIe5A 
http://www.press-citizen.com/article/20120326/OPINION03/303260006/State-needs-keep-an-eye-online-schools?odyssey=nav%7Chead 
http://www.k12.com/  
http://distancelearn.about.com/od/onlinepublicschools/a/OnlinePS.htm 
http://virtualschool.k12.wv.us/vschool/index.html 

http://virtualschool.k12.wv.us/vschool/courses/coursecatalog.cfm 

Friday, March 16, 2012

KidzNGIS or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love GIS

Many planners have at least heard of GIS and the behemoth Arc platform by ESRI (pronounced as separate letters). I personally hate the program, and everything it stands for. Why? It never works and the only people who act they know how to use the program, never seem to be able to actually complete a project correctly. That is my personal observation, so take it with a grain of salt, but I am not alone.

So I was intrigued when I read this article about North Carolina incorporating ArcGIS into K-12 education. The article reads like a press release hailing the advance of GIS and the need for children to learn about spatial analysis. It is a cool license, considering ESRI charges about $1,400 bucks for one license, and a yearly $400 after that. With this scheme, NC schools and their after school club counter parts (things like 4H and the Scouts), will get free access.

I get pessimistic though. Maybe it is my age but I remember Oregon Trail and limited access early internet taking up the majority of the computer lab's computing resources. If anything, I would be a little scared if my job was in the mapping cave (seriously, these rooms exist, they move the cartographers as far underground as possible to avoid them having to interact with anyone). Now children could be coming out of high school with more GIS experience than the senior cartographer, and they work for minimum wage.

Personally, I would prefer a GIS program that actually functioned easily and was accessible by everyone. This isn't really about the main functions that GIS can perform, those really haven't changed. What has occurred is a program has been developed that every six months changes so much that no knows how to use it without going back to ESRI and spending money to figure out where the layout button has been moved to. Or even better, you think you have a program that actually works for something but for some reason this image pops up right when you get your data the way you want:



GIS in schools, Sure why not. ArcGIS in schools, stop making people slaves to ESRI! I am seriously thinking about using QGIS, and hey guess what, it is always free. Maybe VA should jump on the freeware bandwagon? Just a thought.

Sources in order of use:
http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/index.html
http://www.esri.com/
http://www.gisdoctor.com/site/2011/02/24/does-everybody-hate-arcgis-10/
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/dailynews/2012/mar/16/news2.html
http://downloads2.esri.com/blogs/images/support_1971.jpg
http://www.qgis.org/

Friday, March 9, 2012

Too Many Links!

I viewed the United States Patent and Trademark Office website and I started counting. The website http://www.uspto.gov/, is pretty straight forward but something got me. The landing page is a series of 142 links and one search bar at the top. That seemed a little odd. I was reminded of all of the crumby government websites that use to exist, and some that still do . Others have raised issue with some of these websites as well. So I wanted to do a simple study on government websites.


I began with a literature review of e-government. I looked for articles that had been published since 2008, as material before web 2.0 would be rather poor for comparisons (that way I am not wasting my time looking at p values for images on a website, type of studies).  I found an interesting model proposed in one such study, that you might not be able to read. In any case "User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction" by Pieter Verdegem and Gino Verleye provides for a way to measure the effectiveness of a government website. The found that "the indicator “reduce the administrative burden” received the highest average score of importance" (Verdegem, P. & Verleye, G. 2009) implying that those services would be of the highest benefit. They used 2006 data, so things could change but I believe that reducing administrative burden would still exist as a user want.


So I came up with a study idea to see if federal websites look as though they reduce the administrative burden. I felt burden would be excessive links. Why excsive links, google isn't fond of  a lot of links, Here is some opinion saying 6 to 7 links max, others note 100 is the limit. I felt that 100 was a good standard. 

I hypothesize that federal government websites are similar to the United States Patent and Trademark Office website and have an excessive number of links, i.e. over 100 links.

I went to a federal website clearinghouse and went through all of the websites alphabetically. Every 142 websites I would save that site to be viewed, providing some randomness. For the sake of time I only went with 3 rounds of random selection. So I went over the sites and reviewed the number of links that they were sporting today March 9, 2012. I also looked at how many email addresses they had. The resulting agencies are as follows:
  • Economic Analysis, Bureau of;
  • Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled; and 
  • National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare
First up in the review Economic Analysis, Bureau of, or as the agency may otherwise be known as: Bureau of Economic Analysis. The landing page for this website has a total of 63 links, 0 email contacts, and one search bar.

Second is Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely DisabledThe landing page for this website has a total of 78 links, 2 email contacts and one search bar.

The final website was the National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicarehe landing page for this website has a total of 13 links, 3 email contacts, and no search bar.

So my hypothesis was wrong, at least based on this rather limited study. I don't feel like doing fancy math at the moment but none of the three had above 100 links. Is the United States Patent and Trademark Office website above and beyond link wise? To be continued...

Sources in order of use:
http://www.uspto.gov/
http://www.dublintown.org/
http://www.informationweek.com/news/galleries/government/info-management/225402205?pgno=6
Verdegem, P., & Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction.Government Information Quarterly26 (3), 487-497.
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35769
http://asitethatworks.com/how-many-main-navigation-links-should-a-website-have/
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-many-links-is-too-many
http://www.usa.gov/directory/federal/index.shtml
http://www.bea.gov/
http://www.abilityone.gov/
http://rs9.loc.gov/medicare/index.html

Monday, March 5, 2012

Just Some Copyright Humor

This past week in class we talked about Intellectual Property Rights. Meaning copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. These four have an abundant amount of information attached to them, so I've found a few things that I found humorous about copyright. To start off here is a comic strip I found on the-digital-reader website depicting the many lawsuits that come from copyright.


This comic strip isn't entirely off base either, many lawsuits do arise when copyright comes into question. This very issue was the essence of the Top 10 Copyright Crimes list that comes from a LawMeme website out of Yale Law School. This list includes many ideas about the average person and the television industry, it's quite comical and may end up being true. With limits on when you can turn the channel as an advertisement comes on or channel surfing in general.

When you search for Copyright Humor on Google.com you can find many humorous parodies about copyright law and the system in general including a dispute with the copyright holders of "The Other White Meat" and ThinkGeek.com as the latter used the former's catch phrase in an advertisement for Unicorn Meat. It seems to me that lawsuits over the use of catch phrases in an advertisement for a fictional animals' meat is unnecessary. However, for the copyright holder of the phrase it means everything. I guess the value is in the eye of the beholder...or should I say the copyright holder?!

The fight against or the fight for information about copyright has been turned into an initiative for QuestionCopyright.org. This website was created in 2007 with the intent to "provide advocacy and practical education to help cultural producers embrace open distribution." There are many articles discussing the issues with copyright and the problems that the industry faces with the use of copyright. In fact one of the contributors to QCO made a video called "Copying is Not Theft" that raises some unique questions about whether copyright limits the industry or whether copying really takes anything away from the creative industry at all. I'll leave it up to you, should copyright laws be made more relaxed or should they become even more stringent to protect our intellectual property from being stolen and used against our will?


Links in order of use:

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Navajo Hipster

On Saturday, March 3rd, an article on cnn.com highlighted an interesting topic with property rights. The Navajo Nation has filed a lawsuit against Urban Outfitters for the use of the term Navajo. A copy of the complaint lists the alleged harms. Specifically listed in the complaint is that "[S]ince at least March 16, 2009, Urban Outfitters has advertised, promoted, and sold its goods under the confusingly similar “Navaho” and identical “Navajo” names and marks on the Internet and in stores across the United States to compete directly with the Navajo Nation’s retail goods." A number of goods are cited with the complaint, and it does look, to the untrained observer, that Urban Outfitters knocked off the styles. So why isn't this a straightforward copyright claim? Enter the Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990.

The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 specifically outlaws the misrepresentation of products in advertising related to Native American goods. As noted from the Indian Arts and Crafts Board " products sold using a sign claiming "Indian Jewelry" would be a violation of the Indian Arts and Crafts Act if the jewelry was produced by someone other than a member, or certified Indian artisan, of an Indian tribe." It appears that through legislative intent, Native American goods are granted a higher level, or at least more express, copyright protection. It appears that the large corporation may get thwarted in an endeavor where they are at a capital advantage. How often does that happen?


Clearly, there is an interest in protecting the livelihoods of Native Americans and their goods. Maybe, these types of protections should be expanded to include more groups? Why should the little guy be forced to exert capital without any kind of backing from the government?