The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 specifically outlaws the misrepresentation of products in advertising related to Native American goods. As noted from the Indian Arts and Crafts Board " products sold using a sign claiming "Indian Jewelry" would be a violation of the Indian Arts and Crafts Act if the jewelry was produced by someone other than a member, or certified Indian artisan, of an Indian tribe." It appears that through legislative intent, Native American goods are granted a higher level, or at least more express, copyright protection. It appears that the large corporation may get thwarted in an endeavor where they are at a capital advantage. How often does that happen?
Clearly, there is an interest in protecting the livelihoods of Native Americans and their goods. Maybe, these types of protections should be expanded to include more groups? Why should the little guy be forced to exert capital without any kind of backing from the government?
Sources in order of use:
Very good point. Other groups may form to secure similar rights - or not.
ReplyDelete